New Media, New Politics?

Quotes that my dissertation cannot afford for me to lose....

Jul 31
“hile it’s almost unheard of for a revolution to come from the people most engaged with the system they’re overthrowing, Politico is an insider’s coup.
Its founders, John Harris and Jim VandeHei, along with Mike Allen, who joined them early on, all between 35 and 45, are standard-bearers of the Washington press corps rather than its malcontents. They’re small-town boys—Harris from Rochester, VandeHei from Oshkosh, Allen from Orange County—who came, wide-eyed, to Washington and rose to top political jobs at the top news organizations. VandeHei and Allen have, between them, cycled through The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and Time magazine. Harris, whose 2005 book, The Survivor, is regarded by the in-the-knows as hands down the best book on the Clinton presidency, was at The Washington Post since he was an intern, in 1985, rising to become the national-politics editor, a position from which he supervised the Post’s White House and campaign coverage.
Their radical idea was not to flatten or break open this most insular of towns but in effect to make it more parochial and self-obsessed.
As insider journalists, they feared that newspapers, more and more the province of the defeated and apathetic, would bring journalism’s stars and elites down with them.
“Newspaper people are living 1950s-style organization-man lives years after that career model became obsolete,” says Harris, a suburban-dad-looking type, who is clearly fighting his own organization-man destiny.
The problem is not, for any of the three founders, merely that the newspaper business is broke, but that newspapers themselves, which so many people are arguing now need to be preserved, are busted: “The Post’s reputation was superior to its actual day-in-and-day-out achievement,” says Harris. “I don’t say that with any kind of malice. It’s not to disparage the Post, but it’s definitely true that a lot of the material was done with a shrug of the shoulders.”
Michael Wolff on Politico | vanityfair.com

“In the Marshall McLuhan prescription, the demands of the medium—for ever more information about actions or events or thoughts nearly simultaneous with their occurrence—change the message and, likely, politics too.” Michael Wolff on Politico | vanityfair.com

“n the fourth issue of Wired magazine, in the fall of 1993, just as the Internet was entering public consciousness, Michael Crichton, the author of The Andromeda Strain and Jurassic Park, wrote an essay arguing that newspapers were doomed because they were too dumb. As information became cheaper, more plentiful, and easier to get, consumers, he argued, would become ever more immersed in their specific interests and understand that their more generally oriented paper—at least in the matter of a reader’s special interest, but also by inference everything else—had no idea what it was talking about.
Sixteen years later, the ultimate result of Crichton’s theory about the fallacy of general-interest news—and, as a corollary, the answer to the riddle of who’s going to report the news when traditional, general-interest news organizations stop doing it—is, for better and worse, Politico.”
Michael Wolff on Politico | vanityfair.com

“Four old-media veterans may have solved the future of news with the Politico Web site, whose audience of six million obsessives and insiders consumes–and feeds–a real-time download of power data. The twist? Politico’s print version is what’s helped make it profitable.” Michael Wolff on Politico | vanityfair.com

“I will defend the “focal point” argument Henry and I made oh so many moons ago.  When the unexpected happens in the world, I do think new blogs and new bloggers can emerge rapidly.  Think of Simon Johnson’s Calculated Risk Baseline Scenario blog in response to the global financial crisis, or Tehran Bureau in response to the Iran election imbroglio.  The difference might be that new bloggers are not exactly neophytes on their subject matter.  Johnson was the IMF’s chief economist, for example.  My fellow bloggers here at Foreign Policy are not exactly novices in the subject matter.  So it might be more accurate to say that the days when someone like Matt Yglesias or Kevin Drum could be vaulted into the top tier of bloggers has come to an end. ” Yes, Laura, I want you to know that I’m linking to you entirely out of guilt | Daniel W. Drezner

“Most of the A-List bloggers aren’t all that influential. When I surveyed key journalists about what blogs they read, they rarely pointed to the traditional A-list blogs. They preferred the niche blogs, which brings me to the next topic. 2. It’s all about niche blogs. If you have a particular expertise and unique perspective, they you can quickly gain a following. Everyone else is out of luck. 3. Norms and practices. Bloggers have undermined the blogosphere. Bloggers do not link to each other as much as they used to.” 11D: The Blogosphere 2.0

Owning the printing press or broadcast tower used to define advantage: I own and control the means of production and distribution and you and don’t, which enables me to decide what gets distributed and forces you to come to me if you want to reach the public through news or through advertising, whose price I alone set with little or no concern for competition.

No more. The press has become journalism’s curse, not only because it now brings a crushing cost burden but also because it led to all these myths: that we journalists own the news, that we’re necessary to it, that we decide what’s reported and what’s important, that we can package the world for you every day in a box with a bow on it, that what we do is perfect (with rare, we think, exceptions), that the world should come to us to be informed, that we deserve to be paid for this service, that the world needs us.

Journalistic narcissism «  BuzzMachine

“One of the things that I know blogs are best at are debunking myths that can slip through traditional media outlets and [into] the conventional wisdom,” said President Barack Obama on a 24-minute conference call late afternoon yesterday with about two dozen progressive bloggers. “And that’s why you’re going to play such an important role in our success in the weeks and months to come.” Obama Calls on Liberal Bloggers to “Debunk” Health Care Myths | techPresident

“My firm belief is that in this web era,” continued Harris, “not all reporters are created equal. There are certain reporters that have a special ability to thrive in this web era, to drive the conversation. They’ve got a quickness, an immediacy, a perceptiveness to say ‘this is a big story, and it is a big story that I’m going to drive right now, not for a big Sunday piece that I’m going…’” Interjected Rose, “It’s immediacy.” “Yep,” said Harris.” Politico Explains Politico | techPresident

“I often tell the story of coming back from a strike when I was Sunday editor of the New York Daily News. We didn’t have coupons because our new owner, Robert Maxwell, was feuding with Rupert Murdoch, who controls coupons – aka FSIs or free-standing inserts – in the U.S. When we got them back, circulation went up more than 100,000. Those readers weren’t buying news. They were buying ads.” The death of snail mail & Sunday papers «  BuzzMachine